
The Design IP team has joined the law firm Saxton & Stump. Our clients now benefit from enhanced statewide and national resources, including support from over 300 professionals, more than 150 attorneys, and a wide range of legal and affiliate services. This page will redirect you to the Saxton & Stump website for additional information regarding the firm and our transition.
Click here to go to Saxton & Stump now or if you are not automatically redirected.

Trademark Information
The information provided below is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal guidance specific to your situation, please consult a qualified attorney.
Trademark Distinctiveness
Distinctiveness is one of the requirements for obtaining a US trademark registration.
Inherently distinctive marks (eligible for the Principal Register):
-
Fanciful – invented marks
-
Example: KODAK
-
-
Arbitrary – real marks that are unrelated to the goods/services associated with the mark
-
Example: APPLE for computers
-
-
Suggestive – marks that hints or suggests a characteristic or quality of the goods/services without directly describing it
-
Example: COPPERTONE for sunscreen)
-
Not inherently distinctive marks:
-
Merely descriptive – describe characteristic or quality of the goods/services
-
Example: CREAMY for ice cream
-
Eligible for Supplemental Register only (not Principal Register)
-
-
Generic – a highly descriptive term that is widely used to refer to a class of goods or services
-
Example: MILK for dairy
-
Cannot be registered as a trademark
-
A trademark can become generic if the it becomes widely used by the public as a common name for a good or service
-
Examples: "Escalator" (originally a trademark of the Otis Elevantor Company); "Aspirin" (originally a trademark of Bayer)
-
-
-
Acquired Distinctiveness (a/k/a “Secondary Meaning). Mark is merely descriptive, but has come to be recognized by the public as identifying the applicant’s goods/services through use and/or promotion of the mark – eligible for Principal Register
Principal Register
-
Eligibility: Inherently distinctive marks and merely descriptive marks that have acquired distinctiveness
-
Key Benefits:
-
Legal presumption of validity, ownership, and exclusive rights
-
Constructive nationwide notice of ownership
-
Eligibility for intent-to-use applications
-
Potential for incontestable status after 5 years
-
Blocks confusingly similar marks from being registered on either register
-
Use of the ® symbol
-
Right to sue in federal court
-
Supplemental Register
-
Eligibility: Merely descriptive marks
-
Key Benefits:
-
Use of the ® symbol
-
Can block similar marks from registration
-
Registration can be cited in opposition or cancellation proceedings
-
May support a future claim of acquired distinctiveness
-
-
Limitations:
-
No legal presumption of validity or exclusive rights
-
Not eligible for intent-to-use applications
-
Does not lead to incontestable status
-
-
Option to Move to the Principal Register:
-
Must show acquired distinctiveness (see below)
-
Establishing Acquired Distinctiveness
In order to be registered on the Principal Register, a trademark applicant must prove that a merely descriptive mark has come to be recognized by the public as identifying the applicant’s goods or services. The more descriptive a mark is, the stronger and more specific the evidence must be to prove acquired distinctiveness. Such proof can comprise the following:
-
Five Years of Exclusive and Continuous -- A sworn declaration of at least 5 years of substantially exclusive use in commerce may be accepted as prima facie evidence. Most likely to be successful for marks that are only mildly descriptive.
-
Additional Evidence (often required for highly descriptive marks):
-
Sales and revenue figures
-
Advertising expenditures
-
Length and geographic scope of use
-
Consumer surveys showing public recognition
-
Media coverage or third-party endorsements
-
Customer declarations or affidavits
-
